Web20 sep. 2024 · The modified Hartwig and Siegel scale showed that the level of severity for the reaction was moderate (level 4b) . Discussion Antituberculosis drugs such as … Web108 Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 12, Issue 9, 2024, 106-110 Sujive et al. Thirty-nine (65%) of the suspected reactions were mild in severity according to the modified Hartwig and Siegel’s ...
Severity assessment of the ADRs by
WebSeverity of the suspected ADRs assessed using Modified Hartwig and Siegel Scale, revealed that 2(4.5%) suspected ADRs were severe, 27(61.4%) ADRs were moderate and 15(34.1%) ADRs were mild in severity. Causality assessment was done by using Naranjo scale. The assessment by Naranjo scale showed that 26 (59.1%) ADRs WebThe Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale was used for assessing the severity.8 This scale consists of seven questions which on answering classifies the severity of ADR as “mild,” “moderate,” and “severe.” Individual scales were utilized for each patient. Confidentiality of the patients was pre - served throughout the study. The collect - healthy boundaries book
Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A ...
WebOnce the information was obtained, the severity of the ADRs was assessed using the ADR Severity Assessment Scale (Modified Hartwig and Siegel). 15,16 Subsequently, the causal relationships of ADRs were assessed, in accordance to the Naranjo algorithm (Definite, Probable, Possible, Doubtful and Not assessable). 17 All ADRs were listed … WebTable 5: Severity Assessment of ADRs by Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale. S.NO Assessment Number of ADRs % 1. Mild 286 64.1 2. Moderate 160 35.8 3. Severe 0 0 Total 446 100 Table 6: Preventability criteria of ADR s according to Schumock and Thornton scale . S.NO Assessment Number of ADRs % 1. Definitely preventable 286 64.1 2. http://jcdr.in/article_fulltext.asp?year=2024&id=15687 healthy boundaries for empaths