Webb28 juni 2016 · Sharon Street, I—Constructivism in Ethics and the Problem of Attachment and Loss, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Volume 90, Issue 1, June 2016, ... We might hope that secular moral philosophy would have something to … WebbHer work concerns the nature of both practical and epistemic reasons, and draws especially on an evolutionary biological perspective. Contact Information Sharon Street …
Sharon Street and Debunking of Morality - Semantic Scholar
WebbSharon Street Oxford Studies in Metaethics 11 ( 2016 ) Copy BIBTEX Abstract This chapter accepts for the sake of argument Ronald Dworkin’s point that the only viable form of normative skepticism is internal, and develops an internal skeptical argument directed specifically at normative realism. Sharon Street (born 1973) is a Professor of Philosophy and Chair of the Department of Philosophy at New York University. She specializes in metaethics, focusing in particular on how to reconcile our understanding of normativity with a scientific conception of the world. Visa mer Street received her B.A. from Amherst College in 1995 and her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 2003 under the supervision of Christine Korsgaard. Street's doctoral dissertation examined the metaethical implications of Visa mer • Street, Sharon (January 2006). "A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value". Philosophical Studies. Springer. 127 (1): 109–166. Visa mer Street's work has been particularly influential in the fields of metaethics, where she defends a doctrine she calls "Humean Constructivism", a term she uses to differentiate her work from the "Kantian Constructivism" of her mentor, Christine Korsgaard. … Visa mer circle empires rivals forces of nature
Sharon Street, A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of …
Webb19 aug. 2013 · Very happy to have Sharon Street joining us at PEA Soup for a stint in the Featured Philosophers chair! Sharon is Associate Professor and Associate Chair of the … WebbPhilosophy. Sharon Street’s evolutionary debunking argument is an epistemological challenge against moral realism. It is built upon the empirical assumption that … Webb30 nov. 2024 · Sharon Street has argued that we should reject theism because we can accept it only at the cost of having good reason to doubt the reliability of our judgments as to what moral reasons there are. The success of her argument depends on the assumption that no realist account of normative reasons that validates commonsense morality has a … diameter of sodium ion